I read an interesting quote:
“Impressive displays of rhetoric and linguistic force are a good way to seem
important and invite a particular kind of admiration, but they tend to silence
dissent and discourage deeper modes of engagement.” - Emily Wilson
I agree with the latter part, that
lack of a shared lexicon impedes communications and discourages healthy
interaction, but I'm not so sure about the first. While some people, at least
some of the time, may have "seeming important" as their goal, I think
often it's just a curse of knowledge -- you get used to thinking the way you
think with the concepts you have available, and in communicating in short-hand
with others who share the same set of terms and concepts. It's easy to lose
others who may be sharp and interested, but just aren't facile with the same
terminology.
I've got a few points about
globalism, competition, opportunity, equality, and the American Dream that I
think are worth sharing and discussing, and I know I've spent a lot of time
reading, listening, and learning, so I'm worried that communication fidelity
will be poor and my influence will be nil. My goal is to "remix" some
key concepts from others (everything is a remix!), so I'll attribute the
underpinning concepts, while adding what may perhaps prove to be, hopefully, my
own novel personal contributions and perspectives.
Before launching off in the coming
days as I get some time to think and write over the holidays, I'll see if I can
create a lexicon of terms and concepts for us to build upon.
Here's a good one: matter as a
persistent store of information - fundamentally, it's just frozen knowledge.
We're all used to the notion of communications -- sending information from here
to there -- and perhaps more vaguely of signals, noise, entropy, and such, but
the valuable facet here is more subtle: matter encapsulates knowledge and makes
one person's skills and knowledge readily accessible to others.
Examples abound: you don't know how
to design and build a car, or an oven, or probably even a hammer, yet you use
these and many other devices everyday and obtain valuable utility from them.
Such re-use is perhaps the single largest contributor to our complex society,
with ever-expanding stratification and specialization.
So, if we can solidify and transport
information via objects, and those objects add utility and value, then
production itself is the replication of useful knowledge as much as it is an
arrangement of raw materials. Computers that help with such replication,
whether a complex AI or a simple process controller, are a related
encapsulation of know-how, another form of information.
I'll just leave this concept here
for rumination and comment, and then build upon it next time.
No comments:
Post a Comment